Where is the Wreckage of UAL 93? *PIC*
Posted By: ChristopherBollyn
Date: Wednesday, 15 February 2006, 1:29 p.m.
http://rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85422
Glen Stanish is a professional pilot who has worked with me
to find the truth of what really happened on 9-11. He
recently sent me the draft of an article that deals with the
absence of any wreckage from the crash site of UAL 93.
Because this subject is ignored by the mainstream media and
professional investigators the efforts of concerned citizens
like Glen Stanish are very important. Where is the
Wreckage of UAL 93? By Glen Stanish, ATP Deliver me,
O Lord, from evil men; preserve me from violent men, Who plan
evil things in their hearts; they continually gather together
for war.
- Holy Bible, Psalms 140: 1-2, NKJV
I most certainly and honestly believe, that sometime in the near
future, it will become common knowledge that the events of 9/11
were an ^Óinside job,^Ô designed, engineered and committed by a
very large and ^Óin control^Ô rogue element within our United
States federal government, used as a false cause, a pretext ^Ö a
lie, to invade two natural resource rich foreign countries, to
further pursue and expand an empire, to change the borders of the
Middle East countries, and as part of the war on terror, or more
appropriately, the war on freedom, was used to frighten the
American people so they would allow the infringement of their civil
liberties and constitutional rights, to allow for closer monitoring
and further oppression. In June of last year (2005), the
CSPAN II network twice aired a Book TV program featuring Professor,
Theologian and Author David Ray Griffin, who said: ^ÓFor many
Americans, the idea that we are living in a country whose own
leaders planned and carried out the attacks of 9/11, is simply to
horrible to entertain. Unfortunately, however, there is
considerable evidence for this view.^Ô In my professional
occupation, I, like many others, have been in a position to
question major parts of the official story of 9/11. I have been an
airline pilot for most of my professional life, having flown for
major airlines such as TWA, American Airlines, a USAir regional,
and most recently ATA Airlines. I have 22 years of aviation
experience with 15 years of scheduled US airline experience. On
9/11, I was employed by American Airlines, one of the two airlines
whose aircraft were allegedly used as missiles by Islamic extremist
hijacker pilots who attacked us because ^Óthey hate our freedoms.^Ô
On one occasion, several months after 9/11, I was reading an
article in American Free Press by investigative journalist
Christopher Bollyn. The article stated that according to many
eyewitnesses at the Shanksville, Pennsylvania crash site, there
wasn^Òt any evidence that a well engineered and constructed Boeing
757 had actually crashed at this location. Many witnesses
reported never seeing any wreckage from this near 250,000 pound
maximum gross take-off weight airliner. As I was reading this
article, it made me wonder how this could be. You see, as airline
pilots and flight crewmembers, we are required by the Federal
Aviation Administration, the FAA, as part of our training with the
airlines, to cover what is termed CRM, or Cockpit/Crew Resource
Management. This is required as part of the Initial Training as new
hires as well as the required annual Recurrent Training for airline
pilots. This CRM training is the study of airline accidents and
incidents, their contributing causal factors, and what we as
crewmembers could have done differently to have prevented a
particular accident or incident. During the classroom instruction,
in addition to reviewing Cockpit Voice Recordings as well as Air
Traffic Control tapes, we are always shown videos, or photos or
slides, or other video news coverage of these accident sites and
the one constant is that after an airline accident, large pieces of
aircraft wreckage remain. Let me give a few examples. TWA 800
was a Boeing 747 that departed NY^Òs JFK airport bound for Paris in
the summer of 1996. During its departure, climbing through 14,000
feet or so, accelerating to cruise climb speed, it allegedly
suffered a freak catastrophic center wing tank fuel explosion. The
aircraft came apart in midair and came crashing down into the
Atlantic Ocean. Do you think it was hard to find any large pieces
of wreckage from this aircraft? Not at all. In fact, the entire
aircraft was recovered and almost completely rebuilt in a
Calverton, NY hangar. Hardly any metal was missing at all. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/tw800/photo.shtml . Then there is
American Airlines flight 965, a Boeing 757, the same type of
aircraft as UAL 93. This Boeing 757 slammed into the mountains of
South America after its pilots became disoriented and tried to
recover from a Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) alert. To see
the wreckage left by this B-757, that encountered a supposedly
similar accident as UAL 93, please see:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa965/photo.shtml . Let^Òs look at
the wreckage of Pan Am 103, a B-747 that blew up over Lockerbie,
Scotland. See: www.airdisaster.com/photos/pa103/photo.shtml and
www.airdisaster.com/photos/pa103/3.shtml . There was a United
States Air Force B-737 that slammed into the terrain and killed
President Clinton^Òs staff member Ron Brown. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/usaf21/photo.shtml . There was an
Aeroflot Airbus that lost control at cruise altitude when the
Captain was demonstrating flight techniques to family members and
also slammed into the ground at a high rate of speed and descent,
much like UAL 93. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/f-ogqs/photo.shtml . There was a
Delta L1011 that encountered unrecoverable wind shear and
microburst activity on its arrival into DFW. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/dl191/2.shtml . American flight 1420
crashed in Little Rock. www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa1420/7.shtml
In Sioux City, Iowa, a United DC-10 crashed after losing
hydraulic systems. Its wreckage is displayed here:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/ua232/3.shtml . A USAir DC-9 crashed
in Charlotte, NC. Please see:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/us1016/photo.shtml . In NY, Avianca
52 crashed after fuel starvation. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/avianca52/photo.shtml . In
Cincinnati, TWA 128 crashed. Look here:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/tw128/photo.shtml . In NY, a United
flight collided in mid air with a TWA flight. The wreckage can be
viewed here: www.airdisaster.com/photos/ua826/photo.shtml . In
Missouri, a Continental flight crashed after a bomb went off in the
tail section. See: www.airdisaster.com/photos/co11/photo.shtml .
More recently, American 587 crashed in NY after encountering wake
turbulence from a preceding 747. See:
www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa587/4.shtml and
www.airdisaster.com/photos/aa587/10.shtml . And near Athens,
Greece, a Helios B-737 crashed into high terrain after its pilots
passed out due to cabin pressure failure. This accident was similar
to alleged UAL 93 in that they both struck the ground at a high
rate of speed. See: www.airdisaster.com/photos/5b-dby/3.shtml .
These photos represent all different types of airline accidents:
high speed controlled flight into terrain, high speed and high
descent rate uncontrolled flight into terrain, low speed stabilized
controlled flight into terrain, in flight break-up due to explosive
event such as detonated bomb, fuel tank explosion, shoot down
missile (?), and in flight break-up due to airborne collision.
As we can see from these photos, it can be positively concluded
that these well constructed Boeing and other airliners do not
vaporize, melt, oxidize, liquefy, or disintegrate to the molecular
level. These types of accidents always leave a large debris field.
Colonel George Nelson, a retired United States Air Force
Officer wrote an article concerning this subject matter entitled:
^Ó911 and the Precautionary Principle: Aircraft Parts as a Clue to
their Identity.^Ô He wrote in part: ^ÓThe precautionary principle
is based on the fact that it is impossible to prove a false claim.
Failure to prove a claim does not automatically make it false, but
caution is called for, especially in the case of a world-changing
event like the alleged terror attacks of September 11, 2001. The
Bush administration has provided no public evidence to support its
claim that the terror attacks were the work of Muslim extremists or
even that the aircraft that struck their respective targets on
September 11 were as advertised. As I will show below, it would be
a simple matter to confirm that they were. Until such proof is
forthcoming, the opposite claim must be kept in mind as a
precaution against rushing to judgment: the hijackings were a part
of a black operation carried out with the cooperation of elements
in our government. In July 1965 I had just been commissioned as
a Second Lieutenant in the U.S. Air Force after taking a solemn
oath that I would protect and defend the Constitution against all
enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I would bear true faith and
allegiance to the same. I took that oath very seriously. It was my
constant companion throughout a thirty-year career in the field of
aircraft maintenance. As an additional duty, aircraft
maintenance officers are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft
accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no
exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap
Investigation Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems
Management at the University of Southern California. In addition to
my direct participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I
reviewed countless aircraft accident investigation reports for
thoroughness and comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector
General, Head Quarters Pacific Air Forces during the height of the
Vietnam conflict. In all my years of direct and indirect
participation, I never witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft
loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that prevented
investigators from finding enough hard evidence to positively
identify the make, model and specific registration number of the
aircraft ^Ö and in most cases the precise cause of the accident.
This is because every military and civilian passenger-carrying
aircraft have many parts that are identified for the safety of
flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time
during a flight, the failure would likely result in catastrophic
loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are
individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked
by a records section of the maintenance operation and by another
section called plans and scheduling. Following a certain
number of flying hours, or, in the case of landing gears, a certain
number of takeoff-and-landing cycles, these critical parts are
required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by specialist
mechanics. When these parts are installed, their serial numbers are
married to the aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft
records and the plans and scheduling section will notify
maintenance specialists when the parts must be replaced. If the
parts are not replaced within the specified time or cycle limits,
the airplane will normally be grounded until the maintenance action
is completed. Most of these time-change parts, whether hydraulic
flight surface actuators, pumps, landing gears, engines or engine
components, are virtually indestructible. It would be impossible
for an ordinary fire resulting from an airplane crash to destroy or
obliterate all of those critical time-change parts or their serial
numbers. I repeat, impossible. [The photos we just reviewed
thoroughly and positively confirm this assessment.] Considering
the catastrophic incidents of September 11, 2001, certain troubling
but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the known facts. I
get no personal pleasure or satisfaction from reporting my own
assessment of these facts^Å UAL 93. Aerial photos of the
alleged crash site were made available to the general public. They
show a significant hole in the ground, but private investigators
were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash site. If an
aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would have been
literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within
the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the
precise tail number or identity of the aircraft. However, the
government has not produced any hard evidence that would prove
beyond a doubt that the specifically alleged aircraft crashed at
the site. On the contrary, it has been reported that the aircraft,
registry number N591UA, is still in operation.^Ô American
Free Press visited Somerset County Pennsylvania to look into some
of the questions concerning United Flight 93, which allegedly
turned over and crashed in a refilled strip mine between
Lambertsville and Shanksville as heroic efforts to thwart the
hijackers attempts were in progress. One of the main questions
concerning Flight 93 is what happened to the physical wreckage of
this well constructed Boeing 757? Where is the ever-present large
debris field? Remember the Pan Am 103 B-747 photos, the huge
piece of cockpit that remained as well as all the other photos of
similar accident sites we previously reviewed? ^ÓThere was no
plane,^Ô said Mayor Ernie Stull of Shanksville. ^ÓMy sister and a
good friend of mine were the first ones there. They were standing
on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so
they were the first here, and the fire department came. Everyone
was puzzled because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But
there was no plane.^Ô
Click to join catapultthepropaganda
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/catapultthepropaganda/join
Click here to join openmindopencodenews
Click to join openmindopencodenews
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/openmindopencodenews/join
^ÓThere was no plane?^Ô AFP asked. ^ÓNo, nothing. Only this
hole.^Ô See: www.airdisaster.com/photos/ua93/2.shtml .
Another eyewitness, Nena Lensbour, who had prepared lunch for the
workers at the scrap yard overlooking the crash site, was also one
of the first people to view the smoking crater. She told AFP that
the hole was five to six feet deep and smaller than the 24-foot
trailer in her front yard. She described hearing an explosion, like
an atomic bomb, not a crash. She said she called 911 and stayed
on the line as she ran across the reclaimed land of the former
strip mine to within 15 feet of the smoking crater. She said that
she did not see any evidence of a plane then or at anytime during
the excavation at the site. Many other eyewitness testimonies
widely conflict with the official account of UAL 93. There are
other problems with the official story of Flight 93. A
well-documented AP story quoting United Airlines CEO James Goodwin
and the Mayor of Cleveland, Michael R. White, was posted on the
website of Cincinnati^Òs WCPO-TV, an ABC affiliate. The report
stated: ^ÓA Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing
Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns
that it may have a bomb aboard said Mayor Michael R. White.
White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport
and was evacuated. United identified the plane as flight 93^Å^Ô
How can Flight 93 crash in Shanksville around 10:00 am, then divert
to Cleveland almost two hours later? How can the Mayor receive such
erroneous information? Wouldn^Òt the FAA ATC Tower Chief in
Cleveland, along with the Cleveland Center controllers as well as
the approach control facility in Cleveland as well as the ground
controllers who all worked this flight know the true identity of
this flight? How about the emergency personnel that are required to
interview the Captain of this flight as well as other crewmembers
in order to make their required reports? Wouldn^Òt they have gotten
the correct flight number as well as the tail number from these
airline professionals? They most certainly would have. John
Carlin of The Independent wrote about United Flight 93: ^ÓThere are
most certainly a number of important unanswered questions. The
shortage of available facts did not prevent the creation of an
instant legend, a legend that the U.S. government and the U.S.
media were pleased to propagate, and that the American public have
been eager, for the most part to accept as fact.^Ô USAF Colonel
George Nelson concludes about Flight 93: ^ÓWith all the evidence
available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that
a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and
certainly not (emphasis added) the Boeing 757 as alleged.^Ô
Glen Stanish is an Airline Transport Rated (ATP) commercial airline
pilot with more than 22 years of aviation experience, 15 years of
which for the major airlines including TWA, American Airlines, ATA
Airlines and a USAir regional. He is also the author of ^ÓUncle
Sam^Òs Christian Patriots, a Personal, Political and Religious
Discussion of September the 11th, War and Peace, and Freedom and
Oppression,^Ô due to be officially released by Tate Publishing
(www.tatepublishing.com ) April 18th 2006. Much of the material for
this article has come from this book. Photo: The size of the
crater was small, about 24 feet across and 6 feet deep, and there
was no sign of any wreckage. A local inbedded "journalist," who is
active military, told Christopher Bollyn of American Free Press
that the ground had liquified and swallowed the plane but that a
wing and engine had bounced off and fallen in the woods about a
mile away from this crater. Do you find this credible evidence of
an airliner crash?
[Shanksville1.jpg]
Rosalee Grable
Date: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:34 pm
Subject: Re: Flight 93 the_webfairy
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Invite to Yahoo! 360º Invite to Yahoo! 360º Remove Author | Ban Author
http://thewebfairy.com/911/93
I've got the mayor's interview with German Television as stills,
http://thewebfairy.com/911/93/mayor1.htm
and as flash video
http://thewebfairy.com/911/93/mayor.htm
and from Tim Canale's 911 coverage dvds comes this reporter saying there
was nothing there but a ten foot hole in the ground.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/93/hole.htm
Lisa Guliani wrote:
Yes, we know it didn't. I'll check out the article. We met
Rodriguez in NYC last September 11. A wonderful guy.
You should check out Phantom Flight 93 if you're so inclined.
We think we've connected the dots.
Thanks for the link!
Best wishes,
Lisa Guliani
Deanna Spingola wrote:
Hello,
An acquaintance of mine, Glen Stanish, a professional pilot
just finished writing a book which has a release date
of April 18. He wrote a very compelling article about Flight
93. It is at:
http://rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=85422
He just received some copies of the book from his publisher
and is sending me one as he has included my article on
William Rodriguez, the last man who escaped from the North
Tower. The name of the book is: Uncle Sam's Christian
Patriots, a Personal, Political and Religious Discussion of
September the 11th, War and Peaceee, and Freedom and
Oppression. Flight 93 did not go down in that field in
Pennsylvania.
Deanna