Run Spook Run..


Run, spook, run
 >>>> S O U R C E <<<<<< 

DISINFORMATION - here, courtesy of Mike Sweeney's web site that 
frankly, we can't hype enough:  a site we
consider THE final word in resources for detecting disinformation
artists and also for countersurveillance information and his great 
newsletter, are the Eight Traits of a Disinformationalist.

If you are a regular reader of some boards and groups you will no 
doubt, upon studying this, be able to start seeing when and where 
disinfo artists crop up. You'll also note a lot of boards/groups 
fill up with old news, rehashed news, CNN reruns, the kind of crap 
that basically pushes good stuff to the bottom of the board, or 
obliterates it entirely. That is their whole M.O., by the way, to 
get the good stuff out of sight. It works, too. Most people buy it 
lock, stock and barrel. We won't name names (for a change!) here but 
on some of the better well known boards, you can pretty much figure 
out who is there to just dump junk up on the board: blah blah kind 
of stuff they cop off of Fox News that frankly, you or I could get 
from Fox News, thank you, without them regurgitating it up on the 
chat group or message board. You know what and who we are referring 
to, most likely. The spy and counterspy site 
< A HREF=""> also contains excellent
material on detecting a mole or disinformation agent who has been 
put on a board or a discussion group in order to raise hell with it, 
scare off truth seekers and legitimate investigators, and discredit 
sincere Patriots and 'do gooders'. There's more of this going out
there right now than you can shake a nightstick at. There's slew of 
people out there who want to distract you from what is really going 
on 'neath your nose.

We raise regularly eybrows for our shrugging off Enron as a 'dog and 
pony show' and giving similar scant attention to the Wag the Dog 
made for TV Afghanistan movie, but in our humble opinion, that's all 
it really is. The war's been pre-fab manufactured in order to effect 
the agenda they want to take place here at home. Tack on the Super 
Bowl, and you've got a captive audience placated and distracted so 
you can carry on about the business of turning our country into a 
police state, a 24/7 surveillance state, and rape what's left of our 

You wonder why we keep cramming tradecraft down your throat about 
how to detect if you are being watched, followed, monitored or under 
orchestrated surveillance? It's because we are trying to throw you a 
life preserver, stupid; the tools to use to save yourself. Time will 
tell how many people wise up to it. Big Brother and his NWO toadies 
count on you staying dumb. We think you can do better. Don't fail 

1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide 
constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or 
credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. 
Virtually everything about their presentation implies their 
authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further 
justification for credibility.

2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, 
either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators 
supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key 
opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a 
commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will 
shift to include the commentator as well.

3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat 
coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior 
record of participation in general discussions in the particular 
public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic 
is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or 
elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and 
complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally 
in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of 
frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. 
Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to 
become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute 
opponent presentation strength.

5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain 
for 'conspiracy theorists' and, usually, for those who in any way 
believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold 
such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a 
single topic discussed in a NG focusing on conspiracies? One might 
think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every 
topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one 
might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their 
actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and 
an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even 
in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely 
stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how 
condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become 
emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo 
artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if 
responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity 
throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble 
maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to 
pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional 
communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable 
to 'act their role in character' as well in a communications medium 
as they might be able in a real face-to-face 
conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and 
indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an 
emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of 
criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will 
generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any 
adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that 
game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others 
think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, 
and so forth, or simply give up.

7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which 
betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really 
knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat 'freudian', so to speak, 
in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within. 
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory 
information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, 
one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor 
communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having 
only a grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots 
who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a 
particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of 

8) BONUS TRAIT: Time Constant. Recently discovered, with respect to 
News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this 
can be seen to work, especially when the government or other 
empowered player is involved in a cover up operation: 1) ANY NG 
posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE 
response. The government and other empowered players....

H. Michael Sweeney
Author, The Professional Paranoid: How to Fight Back When Followed, 
Surveilled, Targeted, or Harassed by Any Agency, Group, or 
MC Realities: Understanding, Detecting, and Defeating Mind Control 
and Electronic Weapons of Political Control Technology;
Fatal Rebirth; and In Mindless Times