(A) the "Russian Roswell"


   The 1986 crash-retrieval of a small sphere in Hill 611
overlooking Dalnegorsk, Siberia has been characterized as 
the "Russian Roswell".  I first became aware of it from a video 
segment by reporter George Knapp who hitched a ride on a military 
helicopter from the naval base at Vladivostok to investigate the 
rumors first-hand.

You can view this using RealPlayer at 
http://www.geocities.com/UFO_Videos .  If the bandwidth at that site 
has been temporarily exceeded for the day, you can download a zipped 
copy (in either RP or WindowsMediaPlayer format) at 
http://www.stealthskater.com/Videos.htm#Dalnegorsk and then proceed 
to unzip it.  In addition, several articles have been archived as a 
single MS-Word document at 
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Dalnegorsk_01.doc .

Two seemingly "minor" points in these reports impressed me.  One was 
the indication of "parent" UFOs searching for the missing probe using 
searchlights that illuminated the ground but no beam or point-of-
origin could be seen for these "lights".  In other words, witnesses 
saw parts of the hillside being illuminated but could not tell how 
the light was being propagated.  If I let loose my imagination, it 
would appear that "they" were able to "force" some electromagnetic 
effect at a distance ^Å in this case causing a target surface to be 
illuminated (passively) or radiate (actively).  Perhaps similar to 
what some propellant-less designs propose by using the nuclear color 
force to project a black-hole type distortion in front of the craft 
acting like a "tractor beam" in reverse (e.g., see 
http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm#Lazar and 
http://www.stealthskater.com/UNITEL_background.htm ).  (Military 
helicopters release free-falling objects which are radiated by black-
body radiation emitted from the helicopter as a form of 
countermeasure against IR-missiles, so this would be another example 
of action-at-a-distance without a perceptible source.)

The other oddity was the disappearance of detected elements in a 
subsequent chemical analysis.  They were noted in a previous analysis 
but weren't found later on.  I'm sure that Russian professors are 
quite expert at their jobs.  And it's not a matter of nuclear 
transmutation or chemical reaction (oh ^Å if it were that simple!).  
What could cause that?  "Pyscho-reactive" materials (item 'E' at 
http://www.stealthskater.com/UFO.htm )?  Microwave-range amplifiers 
from the Roswell craft that have a secondary effect of decomposing 
substances into their elemental constituents 
(http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Swartz_1.doc )?  Treading on 
dangerous ground here, the ultra-ultra-pure gold strands in gauze-
like fabric reminded me of the ORMEs/ORMUS stuff 
(http://www.stealthskater.com/ORMEs.htm ) .  Again, I'm sure the 
Soviet lab institutes have already covered all of the obvious and not-
so-obvious potential reasons ^Å yet it still remains a mystery (at 
least to the general public).

(B) Backward Time- Travel along a previously-established history path.


    The fabled Philadelphia Experiment has had many different
accounts over-the-years.  If you are a believer, the most common 
version is that it initially involved tests that would make a warship 
radar-invisible.  Many of the naval authorities I contacted said that 
radar detection of ships is not that important compared to other 
means.  Nowadays, for example, British military satellites can tell 
the class of ship by analyzing its wake "signatures" (reminds me of a 
passive "AWACS"/"Hawkeye").

There is another version was first revealed to me in Chica Bruce's 
book 'The Philadelphia Experiment Murder' 
(http://www.chica.bruce.net/ ).  Nikola Tesla supposedly discovered 
that applications of certain fields would cause an object to move 
backwards over the path it had just taken on his test bench.  So it's 
not "pure" time-travel or anywhere-teleportation of the type that 
usually comes to our mind.  More of a "pseudo" time-travel.

During the War, the Allieds were losing a lot of ships to mines that 
weren't detected until it was too late.  This account suggests that 
the field-generating equipment on Tesla's workbench was massively 
scaled-up to fit on a minesweeper -- not a "decoy" destroyer like the 
Eldridge -- to allow it to go "back in time" over its established 
path and make course adjustments to avoid the mines.  Details can be 
seen at http://www.stealthskater.com/PX.htm#Chica . (note: her book 
is inexpensive and its investigative reports appear solid.)

Something similar was echoed in a recent KeelyNet post [html] 
(http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m14762.html  -or- [MS-Word] 
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/PX_02.doc .

And former ELINT Sgt. Dan Sherman of "Project Preserve Destiny" fame 
said his ET contacts indicated they "manipulated" time rather than 
confronted it head-on.  I can't figure it out ^Å maybe you can => 
http://www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Sherman_1.doc .  (Sherman's 
complete story is at http://www.stealthskater.com/Sherman.htm ).

Sherman's stuff may not relate at all to what the former 2 references 
did.  Indeed, one of the major stumbling blocks to ANY of these far-
out claims is that none of them agree 100% with the any other.  So 
either you have many, many different UFOs, time machines, and 
Stargates operating by different species using different 
methodologies ^Å OR only a few (or one) are 'correct' ^Å OR it's all a 
maze of elaborate disinformation.

Tom Mahood always reminded me of two sobering thoughts:  (1) if 
something sounds too good to be true, then it usually is; and (2) 
extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof!  (The latter 
applies to physics as well as to folklore.  "Proof" means 
reproducible events in the laboratory ^Å not in curve-fitting models 
or "eyewitness accounts".  Else it's just ink on paper.)